A few comments about education in DC & elsewhere

(1) The US tax code gives extremely wealthy people the opportunity (at the expense of other taxpayers) to intervene in public policy in all kinds of ways. It is not an exaggeration to say that many obnoxious, predatory (criminal?) businessmen have been able to purchase the good will of the public by putting their wealth into things that appear to benefit the public. When we think these days of the names Rockefeller, Frick, Morgan, Carnegie, Yerkes, and Ford, we tend to think of the nice foundations, museums, telescopes, and research that their monies funded. Of course, that was OUR money that these robbers stole. No-one remembers today, for example, what an evil anti-semite and racist Henry Ford was, or how Andrew Carnegie and Henry Clay suppressed steel workers’ totally legitimate desire for safer and less brutal working conditions, the right to collective bargaining, and much more. When these wealth individuals donate to charities or set up trusts, it is precisely because the tax code gives them huge benefits for doing so. Either they can pay this money to the federal or state treasuries, or they can spend it on anything they want – almost. In the case of Gates and Broad and the rest of the current handful of billionaires, they may think that they know what to do about public education, but the most charitable thing one can say, so far, is that they are consistently wrong. (If you want to accuse me of favoring some sort of socialism, that’s fine – I plead guilty.)

(2) As a 3rd-generation Washingtonian, a 30-year veteran teacher in DCPS, a former DCPS student myself (starting 50 years ago this fall), a child of a former DCPS art teacher, and the parent of two young recently-married adults who went K-12 through DCPS, I have never been impressed by the superintendents and school boards we have had. (Janey and McKenzie weren’t too bad; the rest were appallingly dreadful. Vance reminded me of old, tottering, semi-fossilized Soviet leaders like Brezhnev, who were periodically propped up to give a TV broadcast about how everything was just hunky-dory.) I only had one principal who was any good (in my opinion). But of all of these DCPS leaders, I would have to say that Michelle Rhee takes the cake for being the most dishonest and mean-spirited, as well as the most clueless about what constitutes good teaching and learning. Which is precisely why I started this blog and retired earlier than I might have.

(3) I agree that teachers are not saints, and that our two main unions (AFT and NEA) often make mistakes or just do the wrong thing. Some teachers (like some of those employed in *any* profession or line of work) need to be in a different job altogether. (And, contrary to the lies of Michelle Rhee, it’s never been all that hard for a principal who cares about education to get rid of a really bad teacher.) The interests of teachers in the public schools, those of the children in their care, and those of the parents of those students, should basically be at least on the same page. The (evil) genius of people like Rhee and Gates is that they have done an outstanding job in demonizing public school teachers and making the case that we deserve no due process, no pensions, and no respect. They have been quite successful in driving a wedge between teachers and parents. It’s really too bad.

(4) I’ve been getting more and more disillusioned by Obama, too. But unlike you, one of my reasons is that I think he’s just about 100% wrong on how to improve public education.

 

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://gfbrandenburg.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/a-few-comments-about-education-in-dc-elsewhere/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

5 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Atticus Stryker, Anne Geiger. Anne Geiger said: GFBrandenburg http://bit.ly/eTJZNm Thought-provoking– #tax code #MichelleRhee #teaching @BarackObama #edreform #schools #politics #parents […]

    Like

  2. Shared this piece with several colleagues. Thanks!

    Like

  3. I’m not that confident about Obama’s stance on public education either–his appointment of Duncan with his record in Chicago (not to mention his speedy intervention into the Gray administration about Henderson) and the “Race to the Top” being just two things that concern me about where this president wants to go. But I want to wait until I see his changes to the Education Act/NCLB mentioned in the State of the Union Address before I make up my mind.
    Meanwhile, Gray’s friendliness to charters in DC which I saw in a number of different ways during his tenure as Council chair and more of since he became Mayor and now has direct control over public schools –appointing a person with a heavy charter background to Deputy Mayor for Education, for instance–is not adding up to my expectations that the whole point of direct mayoral control was to raise DCPS up, not disfigure or dismantle it so that there is nothing left but charters!
    With maybe a few vouchers thrown into the mix if the Republicans can somehow convince people that spending money on that program is a cut in spending!

    Like

    • When I was recently in central and southern Anacostia, I was stunned at how many of the regular public schools there have been converted to charters.

      Like

  4. Thanks for providing such important informations about education..

    Like


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: