A Warning to Young People: Don’t Become a Teacher

A Warning to Young People: Don’t Become a Teacher
Posted: 04/09/2013 4:58 pm
by Randy Turner

Nothing I have ever done has brought me as much joy as I have received from teaching children how to write the past 14 years. Helping young writers grow and mature has been richly rewarding and I would not trade my experiences for anything.

That being said, if I were 18 years old and deciding how I want to spend my adult years, the last thing I would want to become is a classroom teacher.

Classroom teachers, especially those who are just out of college and entering the profession, are more stressed and less valued than at any previous time in our history.

They have to listen to a long list of politicians who belittle their ability, blame them for every student whose grades do not reach arbitrary standards, and want to take away every fringe benefit they have — everything from the possibility of achieving tenure to receiving a decent pension.

Young teachers from across the United States have told me they no longer have the ability to properly manage classrooms, not because of lack of training, not because of lack of ability, not because of lack of desire, but because of upper administration decisions to reduce statistics on classroom referrals and in-school and out-of-school suspensions. As any classroom teacher can tell you, when the students know there will be no repercussions for their actions, there will be no change in their behavior. When there is no change in their behavior, other students will have a more difficult time learning.

Teachers are being told over and over again that their job is not to teach, but to guide students to learning on their own. While I am fully in favor of students taking control of their learning, I also remember a long list of teachers whose knowledge and experience helped me to become a better student and a better person. They encouraged me to learn on my own, and I did, but they also taught me many things. In these days when virtual learning is being force-fed to public schools by those who will financially benefit, the classroom teacher is being increasingly devalued. The concept being pushed upon us is not of a teacher teaching, but one of who babysits while the thoroughly engaged students magically learn on their own.

During the coming week in Missouri, the House of Representatives will vote on a bill which would eliminate teacher tenure, tie 33 percent of our pay to standardized test scores (and a lesser, unspecified percentage for those who teach untested subjects) and permit such innovations as “student surveys” to become a part of the evaluation process.

Each year, I allow my students to critique me and offer suggestions for my class. I learn a lot from those evaluations and have implemented some of the suggestions the students have made. But there is no way that eighth graders’ opinions should be a part of deciding whether I continue to be employed.

The Missouri House recently passed a budget that included $2.5 million to put Teach for America instructors in our urban schools. The legislature also recently acted to extend the use of ABCTE (American Board for Certification of Teacher Excellence), a program that allows people to switch careers and become teachers without having to go through required teaching courses.

It is hard to get past the message being sent that our teachers are not good enough so we have to go outside to find new ones.

And of course to go along with all of these slaps in the face to classroom teachers, the move toward merit pay continues. Merit pay and eliminating teacher tenure, while turning teachers into at-will employees are the biggest disservice our leaders can do to students. How many good classroom teachers will no longer be in the classroom because they question decisions by ham handed administrators looking to quickly make a name for themselves by implementing shortsighted procedures that might look good on resumes, but will have a negative impact on student learning.

If you don’t believe this kind of thing will happen, take a look at what has occurred in our nation’s public schools since the advent of No Child Left Behind. Everything that is not math or reading has been de-emphasized. The teaching of history, civics, geography, and the arts have shrunk to almost nothing in some schools, or are made to serve the tested areas. Elementary children have limited recess time so more time can be squeezed in for math and reading.

Even worse, in some schools weeks of valuable classroom time are wasted giving practice standardized tests (and tests to practice for the practice standardized tests) so obsessive administrators can track how the students are doing. In many school districts across the nation, teachers have told me, curriculum is being based on these practice standardized tests.

That devaluation and de-emphasis of classroom teachers will grow under Common Core Standards. Pearson, the company that has received the contract to create the tests, has a full series of practice tests, while other companies like McGraw-Hill with its Acuity division, are already changing gears from offering practice materials for state tests to providing comprehensive materials for Common Core.

Why would anyone willingly sign up for this madness?

As a reporter who covered education for more than two decades, and as a teacher who has been in the classroom for the past 14 years, I cannot remember a time when the classrooms have been filled with bad teachers. The poor teachers almost never lasted long enough to receive tenure. Whether it is was because they could not maintain control over their classrooms or because they did not have sufficient command over their subject matter, they soon found it wise to find another line of work.

Yes, there are exceptions — people who slipped through the cracks, and gained tenure, but there is nothing to stop administrators from removing those teachers. All tenure does is to provide teachers with the right to a hearing. It does not guarantee their jobs.

Times have changed. I have watched over the past few years as wonderfully gifted young teachers have left the classroom, feeling they do not have support and that things are not going to get any better.

In the past, these are the teachers who stayed, earned tenure, and built the solid framework that has served their communities and our nation well.

That framework is being torn down, oftentimes by politicians who would never dream of sending their own children to the kind of schools they are mandating for others.
Despite all of the attacks on the teachers, I am continually amazed at the high quality of the young people who are entering the profession. It is hard to kill idealism, no matter how much our leaders (in both parties) try.

I suppose I am just kidding myself about encouraging young people to enter some other profession, any other profession, besides teaching.

After all, what other profession would allow me to make $37,000 a year after 14 years of experience and have people tell me how greedy I am?

 

Published in: on April 16, 2013 at 8:45 pm  Comments (1)  

Mental Problems

A telling quote from the mouth of Michelle Rhee; I saw her say it a few years ago on Frontline by PBS, and my jaw dropped. Here it is in print, according to John Merrow, the reporter who did the interview:

“I asked her [Rhee] if she had any regrets about her actions. “I’m a very unusual person in that, in my entire life, I don’t have any regrets.  I’m a person without regret.  Now, are there things that I could have done differently?  And if I had to rewrite it, you know, I would have, you know, done it with a smarter way or whatnot, yeah.  There are absolutely things that I could have done better. But regrets?  No.”

Published in: on April 16, 2013 at 8:50 am  Comments (3)  

“Erase to the Top”

Remember that TIME magazine cover with Michelle Rhee holding a broom in front of an empty classroom, suggesting she was going to sweep out all of us riff-raff teachers?

Someone has modified the cover. It now has Rhee holding a very large Number Two pencil, with a large pink eraser at her feet; the title is “Erase to the Top”.  The text reads:

“Michelle A. Rhee, America’s most famous school reformer, was fully aware of the extent of the problems when she glossed over what appeared to be widespread cheating during her first year as Schools Chancellor in Washington, DC.”

Rhee Time Cover

 

(improved image is courtesy of the artist)

==================

Published in: on April 16, 2013 at 8:18 am  Comments (4)  
Tags: , ,

More on Advanced Placement Tests, 1955-2011

Last post, we looked at the total number of students taking Advanced Placement exams since 1955.

What about pass rates? Are more kids taking them but flunking them?

In a few places, that may be true, especially schools that are trying to do well on Jay Mathews’ fairly short-sighted ‘Challenge Index’. But look for yourself at the graph below, which shows how many students get scores of 3, 4, or 5 (passing)  on their exams and how many get scores of 1 or 2 (not passing). This graph only goes back to 1991, because that’s all that I could find on The College Board website.

passing + failing numbers of AP exams 1991-2011

 

I present the pass rates next as a percentage, rather than the absolute numbers.  In general, pass rates are declining a bit, but not tremendously. It would be better if the pass rates were bit higher, but consider this:

If a test is really rigorous, as these tests are, NOT EVERYBODY IS GOING TO SUCCEED.

Remember: neither you nor I would probably be able to pass the AP Chemistry test unless we happened to be an AP Chemistry teacher.

Nor could we succeed at being on ANY national Olympic Decathlon team, to pick a sport at random!

pass rates on AP exams 1991-2011

 

Once again, my point is this: despite all the problems that they really do have, and despite all the pressures and attacks on American public schools they are, in fact, doing some things much better than ever before, despite everything.

And it’s taken a lot of hard work by professionally trained and experienced teachers and administrators, with support from families and local school boards, to accomplish this.

Neither Bill Gates, Michelle Rhee, Wendy Kopp, nor Arne Duncan attended public schools. At best, they don’t know what they are talking about. At worst, they are trying to destroy American public education completely.

American Public Schools Are NOT Failing — For Example, Look At Advanced Placement Tests

Big shots like Bill Gates, Arne Duncan, and Michelle Rhee assure us constantly that American public schools are failing and that only their leadership will save us.

Funny thing: every time they get their hands on a public school system, they screw it up worse than ever.

Another funny thing: while I certainly know that US public schools have lots of problems, in many ways they do a fantastic job.

One of those little ways is in offering Advanced Placement (or AP) courses and exams to more and more students.

Exhibit A, here, is a graph of the total number of students taking AP courses since the program began in 1955, up to 2011 (the last year for which The College Board has printed data), and the total number of exams given. (FYI, the ratio of exams to students is about 1.7, which means a lot of kids are taking two or more AP exams). This is not a graph showing things getting worse and worse. On the contrary, it’s a graph of things getting remarkably better, almost exponentially better.

)I’m not making this up. (I give the source at the bottom of the graph.

advanced placement tests 1955-2011

 

Let’s put that into perspective. Back when I was a supposedly hot-shot ace scholarship student at Phillips Exeter Academy in 1966, I took (and got a 3 on) the AP calculus exam along with a few thousand of other kids at a relative handful of magnet schools like Stuyvesant in NYC. Last year, nearly two MILLION students across the US took nearly 3.5 MILLION Advanced Placement exams in thirty-some different subjects, many of them getting much better scores than I did.

These AP kids are not all going to private or parochial or charter schools. Parochial school enrollments are dropping rapidly, and the charter schools that I know of here in Washington DC have absolutely miserable AP testing rates. The vast majority of the kids taking those AP tests attend public high schools, mostly in suburban districts.

But do they pass those tests? YES, mostly. A passing score is considered to be a 3, 4, or 5; it used to be that just about any college would grant a semester’s worth of credit for any passing score, but these days, many of our most selective colleges have tightened the requirements greatly, so that they only award credits for a ‘perfect’ score of 5, or don’t allow credit at all.

In the old days, you could get into almost any Ivy League or Seven Sisters college simply by being wealthy or being the son of an Ivy League alumnus. Nowadays, you have to have a GPA over 4.0, plus tons of volunteer work, plus be a varsity athlete, plus have numerous successful AP exams, plus tons of great recommendations. And all that might not work anyway; they turn away more and more applicants every year.

Some folks say that AP exams are superficial and don’t show evidence of thought. How wrong they are. I dare any of my readers to try any AP exam in any subject, and prepare to be humbled. (Of course, if you are currently a teacher of an AP course, you would have a tremendous advantage in that area; so, for this to be a fair challenge, try an AP exam in some other topic altogether. Here is the URL to find sample AP exams that you can download and try, for free.

Published in: on April 14, 2013 at 9:01 pm  Comments (7)  

Here is the ‘Smoking Memo’

Without any comment from me, here is the entire ‘Smoking Memo’.

erin dcps lawyer cheating memo page 1

 

erin dcps lawyer cheating memo page 2

 

erin dcps lawyer cheating memo page 3

 

 

erin dcps lawyer cheating memo page 4

The ‘Smoking Memo’ on Michelle Rhee’s EraserGate was leaked to John Merrow

The “smoking memo” has turned up.
The one that Michelle Rhee, Kaya Henderson, and Charles Willoughby didn’t want the public to see.

The one where the testing company expert told them all about the cheating and what steps they should take — none of which were taken.

That memo was leaked to John Merrow of Frontline. You really should read his entire article. It’s long, it’s got footnotes, and it’s excellent.

http://takingnote.learningmatters.tv/?p=6232&cpage=1#comment-19730

===============

Teachers, parents, and concerned citizens should take the time to read this long, footnoted, in-depth follow-up by John Merrow (a journalist at Frontline) on the cheating scandal (by adults) in Washington, DC public schools, in particular at Noyes right here in Brookland.
 
The article points out several things:
(1) Rhee gave lots of money to adults who cheated
(2) She put impossible pressure on principals to cheat; they, in turn, put that pressure on their teachers
(3) The achievement gap between white and black students, and between poor kids and wealthier kids, increased on Rhee’s and Henderson’s watches; any increases in NAEP scores are continuations of trends that began under her predecessors; and DCPS students’s scores are still at the bottom of the nation
(4) Rhee, Henderson, Kamras, and IG Willoughby have steadfastly refused to investigate the cheating seriously and to do the sort of analysis that actually shows malfeasance
(5) Turnover among administrators and teachers in DCPS has turned a revolving door into a whirlwind
(6) The idealistic principal who followed Wayne Ryan at Noyes, and who was originally a great admirer of Rhee, found a lot of evidence of cheating there, but her whistleblower suit was dismissed, and she now runs a cupcake store
(7) Despite noises to the contrary by Rhee, the number of highly-paid central-office administrators has jumped; DCPS has the highest administrator-to-student ratio anywhere in the region
(8) Funds that should have been used to help students who were behind were, instead, used to pay illegitimate bonuses to dishonest adults.
Here is the URL:
==========
A couple of key quotes:

” former DeKalb County District Attorney Robert … Wilson said that he had been following the DCPS story closely.  “There’s not a shred of doubt in my mind that adults cheated in Washington,” he said. “The big difference is that nobody in DC wanted to know the truth.”

*****

It’s easy to see how not trying to find out who had done the erasing–burying the problem–was better for Michelle Rhee personally, at least in the short term.  She had just handed out over $1.5 million in bonuses in a well-publicized celebration of the test increases[9]. She had been praised by presidential candidates Obama and McCain[10] in their October debate, and she must have known that she was soon to be on the cover of Time Magazine[11].  The public spectacle of an investigation of nearly half of her schools would have tarnished her glowing reputation, especially if the investigators proved that adults cheated–which seems likely given that their jobs depended on raising test scores.

Moreover, a cheating scandal might well have implicated her own “Produce or Else” approach to reform.  Early in her first year she met one-on-one with each principal and demanded a written, signed guarantee[12] of precisely how many points their DC-CAS scores would increase.

It’s 2013.  Is there any point to investigating probable cheating that occurred in 2008, 2009 and 2010?  After all, the children who received inflated scores can’t get a ‘do-over,’ and it’s probably too late to claw back bonuses from adults who cheated, even if they could be identified.  While erasure analysis would reveal the extent of cheating, what deserves careful scrutiny is the behavior of the leadership when it learned that a significant number of adults were probably cheating, because five years later, Rhee’s former deputy is in charge of public schools, and Rhee continues her efforts to persuade states and districts to adopt her approach to education reform–an approach, the evidence indicates, did little or nothing to improve the public schools in our nation’s capital.

This story is bound to remind old Washington hands of Watergate and Senator Howard Baker’s famous question, “What did the President know and when did he know it?” It has a memo that answers an echo of Baker’s question, “What did Michelle know, and when did she know it?” And the entire sordid story recalls the lesson of Watergate lesson, “It’s not the crime; it’s the coverup.”

That Michelle Rhee named her new organization “StudentsFirst” is beyond ironic.

An Assessment of KIPP NYC by a former TFAer

This is a very interesting assessment of what a lot of classes were like at KIPP’s only high school so far in New York City.

Not awesome, not excellent, just ‘meh’ at best. Though we are constantly assured how wonderful they are.

http://garyrubinstein.teachforus.org/2013/04/10/teacher-quality-at-kipp/

Here is one of the comments:

Jane G.

I have mentioned on a few blogs of my nightmare experience working for a year in a KIPP school. I was a veteran teacher who was dumb enough to transfer into a KIPP school. In the year that I was there I saw tremendous staff turnaround. Teachers quit in the middle of the year and were fired in the middle of the year. The entire school seemed like a cult with constant chants, rituals, and songs. The students were told to NOT speak to other students from other schools and were constantly prodded to “work hard be nice”. There was an unrelenting pressure that life as you know it consists of getting into college. The staff was extremely overworked, underpaid, and even had to go on weeklong field trips out of state. All in all, it was the saddest experience of my teaching career. I would never even think of suggesting to any teacher to think of teaching in a KIPP school. They are a world within a world and they care nothing other than spreading their false bill of goods to parents, teachers, and the community. When you have carte blanche to brainwash kids, utilize boarderline mental abuse, and kick kids and teachers out at the drop of a hat, you will have a totalitarian school where results are met by means that are never justified by ends.

Published in: on April 10, 2013 at 8:02 pm  Comments (1)  
Tags:

An Evaluation of Billionaire Gates

Anthony Cody has done a masterful evaluation of Billionaire Gates and the lousy results he’s been getting as he throws his unaccountable billions around in American education. I hope he won’t mind me re-publishing it in its entirety.

Accountability for Mr. Gates: The Billionaire Philanthropist Evaluation

By Anthony Cody on April 5, 2013 12:24 AM

Bill Gates, who is more responsible than anyone for the absurd evaluations by which teachers are now being held accountable, had the gall to write this week in a tone of exasperation about the results of his own advocacy for these very practices.

Yesterday I asked when Mr. Gates, the great enthusiast for accountability for others, might hold himself accountable for his own handiwork.

As wealth has concentrated in the accounts of individuals such as the Gates, Walton and Broad families, they have used this to wield unprecedented power over the lives of those of us without access to such resources. They pay for research that creates the very “facts” upon which public debate is based. They pay for their own media outlets, and heavily subsidize others. Their money redirects existing grassroots groups, and underwrites new ones. They work with ALEC to write legislation, and funnel money through PACs to buy off politicians to move it forward across the country. They are utterly insulated from any sort of accountability. They do not face voters in any election. Nobody “evaluates” them. They cannot be fired. They may on occasion choose to engage in a dialogue, but they are not obliged to respond to the substance of the criticisms raised. As my question indicated, this accountability they demand from teachers is a street that goes one way only.

But let’s imagine we could turn the tables on Mr. Gates and evaluate his performance as a philanthropist. Might we establish some goals to which we could hold our billionaires accountable? We do not have any measurable indicators such as test scores to use, but since I do not find these to be of great value in any case, I will offer a more qualitative metric, based on my knowledge of the subject’s work. Since he has spoken glowingly of the salutary effect of feedback on teachers, surely he will welcome this feedback, even though it is unsolicited.

In the tradition of the Danielson and Marzano teacher evaluation frameworks, I offer the Cody Billionaire Philanthropist Evaluation Model, as applied to Bill Gates.

Standard 1: Awareness of the Social Conditions Targeted by Philanthropy
RatingBelow Standard
Mr. Gates does not demonstrate an understanding of the social conditions that are the focus of his philanthropy. Actions and statements by him and his representatives indicate ignorance of the pervasive effects of poverty, and the overwhelming research that indicates the need to address these effects directly. Mr. Gates has not attended public schools, nor worked in an educational context, and thus he has no personal expertise. He primarily cites research he has paid for himself, which tends to conform to his views. His representatives claim their Foundation lacks the resources to address poverty, and insists that educators bear the burden for overcoming its effects with minimal support.

Recommendation for Professional Growth:

We recommend Mr. Gates take a year off from his work as a philanthropist, and work as a high school instructor in an urban setting. His students should include English learners, students who are homeless, and those designated as Special Education. He should work alongside a fully credentialed professional educator, who will provide him with feedback, and reflect with him as he gains an understanding of how we create effective learning conditions for students.

Standard 2: Understanding of how Learning is Measured
Rating: Below Standard
Mr. Gates has concluded that measurement is the primary means by which social progress can be made. He has determined that test scores are an adequate means of measuring learning, and promoted a wide variety of ways by which these scores are used to measure learning, and reward teachers and students accordingly. This is based on a fundamental error. In fact, test scores measure only a small part of what we value.

Recommendations for Professional Growth:

Mr. Gates should first read Stephen Jay Gould’s Mismeasure of Man, for an understanding of the history of testing. He should also read Daniel Koretz’ book, Measuring Up, What Educational Testing Really Tells Us.

Mr. Gates should, with the help of an experienced educator, design a series of rich PBL projects that allows each of his students to demonstrate their learning through authentic products in real-world contexts. He should compare the work they are capable of producing to their standardized test scores, and reflect on the things that each mode of measurement captures.

Standard 3: Understanding of How Teaching is Evaluated
Rating: Below Standard
Compounding the fundamental error regarding the measurement of learning described under Standard 2 above, Mr. Gates has promoted the use of teacher evaluations based in significant part on test scores and VAM systems. Research does not support this use of test scores, and raising the stakes on test scores has promoted widespread teaching to the test. Mr. Gates has made statements that indicate he is unaware of effective evaluation practices, such as the Peer Assistance and Review program and others.

Recommendations for Professional Growth:
Mr. Gates should spend a week shadowing PAR consulting teachers as they work with teachers in Toledo, Ohio. He should review the research on forms of effective evaluation practices.

As recommended above, he should serve as a classroom teacher for a full year, and have his performance rated based on VAM scores derived from standardized tests taken by his students. He should reflect with his colleagues on the validity of these ratings. He should also meet with a peer evaluator to set professional goals at the start of the year, and several times during the year meet with this person to reflect. At year’s end he should compare the models of evaluation he experienced, and reflect on which were of greater validity and value.

Standard 4: Understanding of Effective Instruction

Rating: Below Standard
Mr. Gates has repeatedly stated that he believes we ought to stop spending money on keeping class sizes small, and instead should use that money to provide performance bonuses for teachers. He has also indicated that we should “personalize” learning through the use of computers and videos that allow students to work at their own pace. This does not comport with what we know about child development, or the importance of personal relationships with students.

Recommendations for Professional Growth
Mr. Gates should spend a week shadowing children in elite schools such as the one attended by his own children, and study the way personalization is accomplished. He should then spend a week shadowing children at a Detroit school where class sizes have been significantly increased due to budget cuts, and the pressure of high stakes have focused instruction on test preparation.

In the year he teaches, he should be assigned at least one class no larger than 15, and another no smaller than 38, and reflect on the learning conditions in these two environments.

Summary of Evaluation Results and Recommendations: 
Mr. Gates falls below standards in all four of the areas that were observed. His philanthropic activities should be suspended immediately pending his completion of the recommended professional growth activities.

A panel of expert reviewers composed of students, parents and educators from communities that are the targets of his philanthropy should be convened to review his reflections at the end of his year of investigation and reflection. This panel should subsequently review and approve the re-initiation of philanthropic projects following this process.

This is the beginning of what might be a far more complex process of reflection for Mr. Gates. It might be seen as absurd, but my intention is sincere. His thinking is magnified in its effect by the billions he has to spend as he chooses. With such power comes a huge responsibility to learn from one’s mistakes. I do not know how Mr. Gates reflects on the successes and failures of his work – there is no evidence of thoughtful reflection in his public writing.

Fairness demands that accountability cannot be a one way street. If Mr. Gates demands that teachers be held accountable for their work, surely he must accept some accountability for his. What is good for the poor geese ought to be good for the billionaire gander, even if he does lay golden eggs.

What do you think of this feedback? Are there other standards we might use to judge the quality of the work of billionaire philanthropists? Have I been fair with Mr. Gates?

Published in: on April 6, 2013 at 10:52 am  Comments (1)  
Tags: , ,

Last Week’s News On Protests Against Educational DEforms

A weekly roundup by Bob Schaeffer:

======================================================
Atlanta School Leaders Indicted in Test-Cheating Scandal
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/30/us/former-school-chief-in-atlanta-indicted-in-cheating-scandal.html
Atlanta Test Cheating: Tip of the Iceberg
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/04/01/atlanta-test-cheating-tip-of-the-iceberg/
Teacher Leader Blames High-Stakes Testing Pressure for Wave of Cheating Scandals
http://www.kfoxtv.com/news/news/ysleta-isd-teachers-association-president-blames-s/nW63K/
Atlanta Scandal Exposes Test Score Racket
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/eugene-robinson-the-racket-with-standardized-test-scores/2013/04/01/1bbd61ea-9b01-11e2-a941-a19bce7af755_story.html
Let’s Stop Cheating Our Kids With High-Stakes Testing
http://www.takepart.com/article/2013/04/02/op-ed-lets-stop-cheating-our-kids-high-stakes-testing
New FairTest Report Finds Widespread Test Score Manipulation, Further Undermining Credibility
http://www.fairtest.org/2013-Cheating-Report-PressRelease

Cheating Scandals Are a Direct Result of George W. Bush Texas “Reforms”
http://blog.chron.com/txpotomac/2013/04/commentary-cheating-scandals-are-an-inevitable-result-of-george-w-bushs-educational-reform/
Road to Atlanta Cheating Scandal Runs Right Through Obama-Duncan White House
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/04/03/bill-ayers-road-to-atlanta-cheating-scandal-runs-right-through-white-house/

Texas Reevaluates Testing in Lower Grades
http://www.texastribune.org/2013/04/02/lawmakers-examine-high-stakes-testing-lower-grades/
Texas Parents Join Forces to Reduce Testing
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/parentsandthepublic/2013/04/texas_parents_join_forces_to_reduce_testing.html

Culture of Testing Drives N.Y. Parents to Opt-Out
http://www.silive.com/news/index.ssf/2013/03/post_449.html
Parents Stand with Teachers Against Excessive Testing
http://rochesterhomepage.net/fulltext?nxd_id=379992
Bloomberg Testing Policy Flunks 2,000+ NYC Third Graders
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/third_class_kids_are_falling_behind_ueO5Zc5QE8XxfGrJHHPi5N

Look Beyond Standardized Testing to Grade Students
http://www.wickedlocal.com/somerville/news/x1551272742/Column-Look-beyond-standardized-testing-to-grade-students

Santa Claus and Standardized Tests: A View from Colorado
http://www.ednewscolorado.org/voices/voices-santa-claus-and-standardized-tests

Portland, Oregon, Students Say: “Testing Isn’t Educating”
http://socialistworker.org/2013/04/02/testing-isnt-educating

Rhetoric vs Research on Rhode Island High-Stakes Test
http://blogs.providencejournal.com/ri-talks/this-new-england/2013/03/bruce-marlowe-rhetoric-and-research-on-necap.html

Parents Opt Children Out of Chicago Testing Overkill
http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/cps-opt-out-standardized-tests-reach-map/Content?oid=9144250

Teaching to the Test is Taking Over Mississippi Schools: Diary of a First-Year Teacher
http://www.takepart.com/article/2013/04/01/diary-first-year-teacher-teaching-test-taking-over-Mississippi-school

No Punishment for Seattle Teachers’ MAP Test Boycott
http://blogs.seattletimes.com/today/2013/03/no-punishment-for-teachers-in-seattle-test-boycott/
Victory for Garfield (and other school) Teachers
http://scrapthemap.wordpress.com/2013/03/29/victory-for-the-garfield-teachers-and-other-map-boycotting-schools-in-in-seattle/

Why I Won’t Let My Son Take the Pennsylvania PSSA Test
http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/opinion/perspectives/why-i-wont-let-my-son-take-the-pssa-681537/

Opting Out of Florida Test is Possible, Though Schools Discourage It
http://www.bakercountypress.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2531:opting-out-of-fcat-is-doable-but-district-discourages-it&catid=59:news&Itemid=57

Opt-Out Activists to Occupy U.S. Department of Energy
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/03/29/key-education-activists-protesting-in-d-c-next-week/

United Kingdom Teachers Union Moves Toward 2014 Test Boycott
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/9964911/Teachers-call-for-boycott-of-primary-school-literacy-tests.html

Bob Schaeffer, Public Education Director
FairTest: National Center for Fair & Open Testing
ph-   (239) 395-6773    fax-  (239) 395-6779
cell-  (239) 699-0468
web- http://www.fairtest.org

Published in: on April 4, 2013 at 5:52 am  Leave a Comment